Friday, March 5, 2010

Comment on this week's readings

Hi, Sandra, Deborah, Jeff and Classmates

This week, I learned new things I could use in class with and for my students to promote my students’ learning. Those things are learner autonomy and one-computer classroom.

All the articles on learner autonomy stress the necessity from reshaping teacher and student roles. Students should be taught to take more responsibility for their learning. Samuel Sheu lets us know that learner autonomy is dependent on teacher autonomy. How can a teacher give some autonomy or independence to his or students if they, themselves, do not have that autonomy? Sometimes the teacher’s goodwill may run up against the in-depth established education system. He notes some constraints to learner autonomy are the education policy through its standards, curricula, textbooks and the examination-dominated system and some school administrators. All these factors do no allow any autonomy both from the teacher and the learner. Based on the literature I read I can say that if change has to occur it can but come from some teachers who would accept to pioneer

I learner from Dimitrios Thanasoulas quoting Holec that learner autonomy is ‘the ability to take charge of one’s learning.’ Learner autonomy supposes the teacher is aware of that necessity and has the ability and the will to help his/her students develop autonomously. Learner autonomy shouldn’t be seen as an end to itself, that is a product; rather, it should be seen as a process. According to Thanasoulas learner autonomy must be build on helping students learn more about their learning, cognitive, metacognitive strategies and on learner’s attitudes, motivation and self-esteem. This is a challenge teachers should take: training to train their students to become autonomous. Thanasoulas suggests three strategies we could apply to promote learner autonomy through self-reports, diaries and evaluation sheets and persuasive communication as a means of altering learner beliefs and attitudes. Richard Smith takes a different approach to promoting learner autonomy through action research.

As for the one-computer classroom, I learned some uses and tips about computers from the article ‘Strategies and Applications for the One-computer Classroom’ by Linda J. Burkhart. The uses of the technology concern both the teacher and the students. For example, the teacher could use the computer as a tool keeping records, manipulating information, creating charts, student lists and name tags, communicating with other professionals and subject experts via email. I could also use the computer for demonstrating concepts, demonstrating writing and editing skills, for having live access to a selected Internet site to retrieve relevant data. As for the students, the computer could be used for finding relevant information for their project-based work, for finding sites for writing when they want to develop their writing skills (how to write an essay, how to write a paragraph, how to use connectors in sentences, how to write good sentences, etc). Another way of developing reading and writing is through blogs, email. The computer could also be used to promote cooperative learning through student projects. For example working on a project of how to raise community awareness of the cutting down of trees in the country, my students will to find appropriate pictures or images from the Internet that show the bad effects of deforestation to convince the community.

The article suggests useful tips that teachers and students could use with the computers to enhance teaching and promote learner autonomy.

Wishes,

Bruno

3 comments:

  1. Dear Bruno,

    As you, I feel empowered by both technology tools and educational articles we read. I liked the articles on learner autonomy and I was attracted especially to the statement that learner autonomy is not genetic, it's the outcome of teachers efforts.

    The following promote learner autonomy:
    1) Teachers should emphasize performance as well as knowledge. Students should be able to do something with their knowlwdge (presentation and social interaction in English)
    2)Some activities should be open ended to allow for a variety of responses from the learners that can all be right
    3) Reflection: teachers can make learners take part in the decision-making about how and what they learn.
    4) One of the best ways of learning is teaching. Teachers can assign some managable parts of the material to students to teach. The teacher will be there for support.

    Ahmad Amer

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Bruno,

    This is Raphaël. I have just read your blog and I liked the question you raised: How can a teacher give some autonomy or independence to his or students if they, themselves, do not have that autonomy?

    This is why here at work we organize mandatory monthly workshops for all our teachers. We shape our teachers the way we want them to teach. We follow very closely the new techniques and we are also helped by the American embassy in Lima that sends us professional trainers to update our teaching.
    We train some teachers (usually we are trained as coordinators) and then these teachers train the rest of the teachers during those monthly training workshops. Afterwards, as I already mentioned in one of my post, we observe classes as a monthly routine in order to check that our teachers apply what they have learned during those training workshops.

    So to answer your question, in order to get your students autonomous learner you have to teach your teacher to be autonomous learners and then to transmit their knowledge to their students.
    We got the same problem here in Peru. How could you teach your students to read and understand what they had read , if their teachers where unabble to do it themselves? What the government decided for public school was to evalutate the level of the teachers and then reject the ones who were not able. The governemnt then started organizing yearly contests for public school teachers. The tests were first rejected by teachers as their level were very low but by organizing workshops for those teachers (free) they are raising our teachers' level. By raising, their level they will raise our students' level and so on.

    See you soon,

    Raphaël

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Raphael, Bruno and Amhed,

    Raphael raises an essential question. The resistance to change for resistance's sake. There are so many teachers around who will not bother to use technology even if they have access to it. I am not saying we should fall for the novelty of it, but we at least need to be aware what is out there that our students could use, then learn how to use it and then implement it, if its use is pedagogically justified.

    We have to be aware that most language teachers (at least those of my generation) will never match our students' skills and ease of use. This should not be the excuse. In sports, a coach is usually inferior in performance to an athlete s/he trains, but it is insight, wisdom, authority and experience that s/he brings in that makes all the difference!

    And I believe it is more than wishful thinking.

    Best regards,
    Andreja

    ReplyDelete